Posted on Leave a comment

‘Are STEM Syllabi Gendered?’ A Feminist Professor Says Women Can’t Do Science – Hit & Run : Reason.com

Every now and then I find an article that is so horrifically stupid that I can’t resist blasting it on the Tome. Those familiar with the Tome know that sometimes I refer to this as Real Horror, and boy, does this little gem of stupidity earn the label.

Apparently, the reason why women do not enter STEM fields is because the scientific  method is sexist! A method in which to conduct science, which says nothing about gender, is sexist!? 

Even better, STEM classes are SO sexist that even their syllabi are gendered and insensitive. Well, maybe that one college in the deep south might have a clause about how women should let be in class, but I don’t see how “promoting the idea that knowledge can be ascertained through reason” is sexist unless you’re implying that women can’t reason, and ifor that’s the case then the real sexist is the one making that stupid claim.

I wish I was making this up. This is a direct quote from the article:

The syllabi for college-level STEM courses—science, technology, engineering, and mathematics—are “gendered” because they promote the idea that knowledge can be ascertained through reason. This is a masculine concept that hurts women’s feelings and makes it difficult for them to succeed.
In addition, apparently the wording of this phrase in a syllabus is offensive to women:

critical thinker considers all available evidence with an open mind and uses appropriate techniques to analyze that evidence and reach a conclusion.

Now, before you go over to the site to channel your frustration, I should point out that this article is actually referring to a scientific study by the University of North Dekota. But that just makes the claim that STEM and scientific method are inherently sexist even more absurd.

http://reason.com/blog/2016/09/22/are-stem-syllabi-gendered-a-feminist-pro

Posted on Leave a comment

Misogyny in Horror Films?

savagestreetssrse-02
Miogyny or just a reflection on the grittiness of our society 

An excerpt from a wikipedia page on Misogyny in horror films

Misogyny can occur in horror films when there is a degrading representation of women. This is found particularly in slasher films, where there is often gendered specific violence towards women.[1] Female characters experience violence and brutality at the hands of male antagonists far more often than male characters in these films. Female characters are more likely to experience sexual violence, particularly in the rape/revenge subgenre. Women in horror films are typically reduced to roles that are considered tropes, such as the final girl, the blond victim and the femme fatale.

Horror is a genre where every character EXCEPT the “final girl” is subject to death, often at the hands of a male. Horror does not in any way ONLY target women, and it most certainly doesn’t give survivor privilege to men. Jason, Freddy, Michael, Leather Face, Ghostface and Chucky don’t give two fucks what gender you are, if you cross them you’re going to die.

If brutal violence towards women in horror are interpreted at misogyny, then the often coupled brutal violence towards men is misandry. I don’t see how a double standard could even apply.

As for as sexual violence, women are often targets of sexual violence in real life as well. If a group of thugs stop a dude walking alone at night, he’ll most likely get mugged for what ever he has on him, maybe killed. If a group of thugs were to stop a chick, then most likely the a similar outcome but with added rape or at least sexual assault. Horror is more than a reflection of our society, it uses our cultural fears and taboos against us for exploitation purposes. Is it misogyny? It’s no more misogyny than the biological differences that lead to the different treatment of our unfortunate dude and chick in the quick theoretical.

Women are no more reduced to stereotypes and tropes than men are. In horror, everyone eventually falls into a stereotype or a trope. Tropes aren’t inherently bad or misogynistic, either.

Overall, horror films often have female leads, and though it’s for sometimes titillating reasons, the female lead roles more often than not end up kicking ass in the end. Laurie Strode fought off and killed Michael Myers (though he came back). Sidney Prescott killed off Ghostface. Alice Hardy kills off Jason’s mom. These three characters are not weak and pathetic women. They kicked ass and survived, whereas the men did not.

Lastly, I like the lack of citation in the very erroneous introduction to “Misogyny in horror”. It really bodes well when for a claim when it has no substantial evidence to back it up.

But, perhaps I missed something. Perhaps horror is a heap of misogyny and I just can’t see it.