With the growing hysteria off people claiming racism in various media and the rise of the PC culture, let’s take a moment to point out that it is way too easy to “find” racism in just about everything. But that does not mean that perceived racism is real, has merit, or is of purpose. In short, not everything is racist.
Take Go Dog Go, for example, the children’s book has a page that teaches the distinction between black and white. A dishonest SJW would squeeze a “that’s racist” comment for attention. Even worse, the page shows only three black dog. A social studies major would interpret that as a statement of our society, when they have no fucking clue why there is only three dogs. Worse than that, the page shows the black dogs working for a white dog, doing tricks for a white dog, and running away from a cop dog.
Super racist, right? No. Somethings are just what they are and have no meaning or interpretive value whatsoever. Go Dog Go could have a cryptic message about Satanism and the worshiping of the great dark lord, but racism just isn’t there.
Miogyny or just a reflection on the grittiness of our society
An excerpt from a wikipedia page on Misogyny in horror films
Misogyny can occur in horror films when there is a degrading representation of women. This is found particularly in slasher films, where there is often gendered specific violence towards women.[1] Female characters experience violence and brutality at the hands of male antagonists far more often than male characters in these films. Female characters are more likely to experience sexual violence, particularly in the rape/revenge subgenre. Women in horror films are typically reduced to roles that are considered tropes, such as the final girl, the blond victim and the femme fatale.
Horror is a genre where every character EXCEPT the “final girl” is subject to death, often at the hands of a male. Horror does not in any way ONLY target women, and it most certainly doesn’t give survivor privilege to men. Jason, Freddy, Michael, Leather Face, Ghostface and Chucky don’t give two fucks what gender you are, if you cross them you’re going to die.
If brutal violence towards women in horror are interpreted at misogyny, then the often coupled brutal violence towards men is misandry. I don’t see how a double standard could even apply.
As for as sexual violence, women are often targets of sexual violence in real life as well. If a group of thugs stop a dude walking alone at night, he’ll most likely get mugged for what ever he has on him, maybe killed. If a group of thugs were to stop a chick, then most likely the a similar outcome but with added rape or at least sexual assault. Horror is more than a reflection of our society, it uses our cultural fears and taboos against us for exploitation purposes. Is it misogyny? It’s no more misogyny than the biological differences that lead to the different treatment of our unfortunate dude and chick in the quick theoretical.
Women are no more reduced to stereotypes and tropes than men are. In horror, everyone eventually falls into a stereotype or a trope. Tropes aren’t inherently bad or misogynistic, either.
Overall, horror films often have female leads, and though it’s for sometimes titillating reasons, the female lead roles more often than not end up kicking ass in the end. Laurie Strode fought off and killed Michael Myers (though he came back). Sidney Prescott killed off Ghostface. Alice Hardy kills off Jason’s mom. These three characters are not weak and pathetic women. They kicked ass and survived, whereas the men did not.
Lastly, I like the lack of citation in the very erroneous introduction to “Misogyny in horror”. It really bodes well when for a claim when it has no substantial evidence to back it up.
But, perhaps I missed something. Perhaps horror is a heap of misogyny and I just can’t see it.
As a member of the undead community, I don’t give a single rigor mortis fuck if you’re pro-life or pro-choice. What I care about is the very real possibility that if pro-lifers got there way that dumpster babies would become a popular trend.
Don’t count it as silly just yet. We all know that there are shit parents out there. Afterall, we have mothers willing to smoke meth while pregnant. We got mothers willing to pimp put their toddlers for drug money. We even have retard idiots that can’t remember if they have their kid in a car. Hello, do you have a memory problem? You can’t remember that you helped you child in the car?
Police looking at a baby that a shit teenage mother didn’t want.
We have a slew of shit parents and it is obvious that an ill prepared shit mother that doesn’t want her child is most likely to resort to drastic measures. I bet that if pro life is a mandate and that abortion is illegal outright then we’ll not only see an increase of dumpster babies, but that’ll become this hip sensation that all the cool chicks get into.
Have you dumped your baby today? #DumpsterBaby
#DumpsterBabies
Listen, pro-lifers, I got your back. I understand the need to protect life and all that, but there are those moms that will just never care, and for that I have a solution!
Feed the unwanted babies AND the mothers that feel just TOO busy and bothered to have a child to me. That’s right. I’ll eat both the child and the mother, and by doing so I’ll not only help the mother and baby join in the afterlife, I’ll also solve the both dumpster baby crisis and abortion happy mothers!
Now, Pro-choicers. I get you, too. I understand that sometimes things happen and there are extreme circumstances where you might need to kill the human life in you. And I’m sure pro-choicers would agree that abortion should not replace birth control or be a fail safe for when a condom breaks or when a woman fails to take her birth control correctly. For those that don’t understand how birth control work and are working on their second abortion, get in line for Undead Greg feeding time.
I don’t expect pro-choicers that kill their lil’ human every time birth control fails to comply willingly, and that is where I can make a deal with the pro-lifers, because they are more likely to be conservative and more likely to have the fire power.
Help Undead Greg feed on the abortion happy pro-choicers AND their dumpster babies and you’ll get absolute zombie immunity. That’s right. I and my undead friends will leave you alone.
Turkey lowered the age of consent to where they essentially legalized having sex with children. Bring this up and your liberal friends will likely argue what’s wrong with legalizing child marriage. Don’t worry, you’re not taking crazy pills, but you’re right to think that there is something completely fucked here, and the irony is delicious.
It was often the argument of the Christian Republican that legalizing gay marriage would be followed by a legalization of pedophilia. This argument was dismissed as a slippery slope, even I disregarded the warning as complete and utter bullshit. There is no way in hell that America would approve of legalizing pedophilia. Think of the children is often used to create stricter laws, not create a safe rape haven for creeps. But, the real horror is that it is true… somewhat.
Liberal leftists and Obama are pushing for lowering the age of consent to thirteen thinking that it’s to protect the children from harsh life of juvy and the stigma of being labelled a sexual predator, but what they’re really doing is giving the green light to pedophile creeps. Imagine your thirteen year old daughter having sex with a twenty-five year old male, in your home, and there is nothing you can do about it because she gave consent. That’s absolute bullshit! That’s insanity!
This is fine, as long as they’re families are cool.
There are people currently advocating for teenagers as young as thirteen to have the legal authority to consent for sex under the guise that they’re biologically ready for sex. They’re biologically ready for fuck way before they’re brain is fully developed to handle the influx of hormones and emotions, which is why teenagers are often so impulsive and make very dumb decisions. Teenagers often think they know and understand the consequences of their actions when they don’t. Which is why teenagers are much more impulsive to do very dumb things, and the number one reason why they are susceptible to peer and ADULT manipulation. We don’t allow teens to vote, because they’re not intellectually ready, but we’ll give them the green light to fuck and expect no repercussions?! Especially in a county where Sex Ed is like the forbidden topic in most schools.
Did you enjoy Sixteen and Pregnant, well, get ready for the exciting Thirteen and Pregnant! It comes with the riveting excitement of child-birth mortality!
Teen fucking teens is one thing. That should be handled between the families and the court. I think it is absolutely ludicrous that teens go to jail for doing what teens do. But, a twenty five-year old male fucking a thirteen year old is bullshit. She may scream and cry that she knows what she is doing, but the power dynamic is completely skewed. The older male is manipulating her, coercing her, which is rape. Feminists, where’s your fight against this lowering the legal age of consent? Don’t tell me you support it because of freedom of choice. Let’s give a thirteen year old the freedom to make a choice that could lead to pregnancy, STD, and emotional distress. Has the Left forgotten about the emotional baggage that comes with child sexual abuse? You know there are perverted twisted sick pucks that get a chub for a thirteen year old that are just waiting for this to happen.
This is not fine. This is fucked up. But some would say its just fine.
The real horror is that the liberal left regressive don’t seem to see the problem with lowering the age of consent. The age of consent laws are designed to prevent people from perping on the young. Yes, creeps still perp on the young, but legalizing it won’t get the perpetrators to stop. It just makes what was once illegal, legal. Awesome, Let’s lower child rape stats by making it legal to fuck children! Let’s not stop there. How about we mandate the schools to install recreational fuck rooms so that the teenagers can fuck each other, right? A legal fuck room where even the teachers can join in, right? I mean, as long as everyone is consenting. hyperbole, but the truth is in the absurdity of it all. Lowering the age of consent would very well lead to a rise of older men perping on children, and as long as both consent, they would be in their legal right to do so. How’s this thinking of the children? How is this protecting our children?
Once 13 year olds are given the legal right to consent to sex, prostitution and pornography will follow. Slipper slope? Bullshit. How are police going to bust a group of “consenting” children, and don’t think that there are parents that are low enough to sell their kids.
Instead of lowering the age of consent, why don’t we instead leave the age requirement and let the families handle how they want to proceed if little Sally and little Johhny were caught having sex behind the bleachers.
Chloe Grace Moretz, actress in Amityville Horror (2005 Remake) and Kick Ass, complained of being a victim of sexism because she’s apparently more known for her relationship with Brooklyn Beckham and has been described as “his girlfriend” on several occasions.
This is not an example of sexism. This is an example of crying victim when people fail to feed your ego. Not everyone will recognize your accomplishments and when they do it’s not ALWAYS a sexist thing. Also, anyone that has ever been in a relationship knows that our other is at times often described as attached in someway. Most people, when they introduce their partner, will describe them as their boyfriend or girlfriend. This is common and is about understanding relationship to the other, not claim of property, not to diminish any credit or accomplishments.
We as a species from relationships with one another and EVERY language from African mouth clicks to English uses words and labels to help identify and understand our relationships with one another. People calling you “his girlfriend” is no more sexist than people calling Hillary Clinton Bill’s wife. The difference here is that people would be less likely to call Hillary Clinton by a label as just about every freakin’ person knows who she is. Whereas Chloe Grace Moretz thinks her reputation is world renown and that EVERYONE must call her by her name and if not they’re sexist.
Why cover this? Chloe was only a child when she acted in Amityville Horror and this is more of a gossip piece than anything else, right? Chloe’s cry as a victim of sexism intrigues me as I’m sure it intrigues others as it says something about the culture around us. A growing culture of victim-playing and making mountains out of mole hills.
But the real reason why I’m covering this is because I love irony. Irony is so damn delicious, and boy does this piece dish it out in droves. It’s like tipped over ice cream truck in a middle of a neighborhood!
This piece is covered in TEENVOGUE and here is the juicy ironic quote:
So, Chloë, we feel you: We’re tired of this everyday sexism. It’s time we define women by their accomplishments, not their relationships.
You read that correctly. A media platform that directs 100% of its content at women, that actively pushes the narrative of women looking good, that actively describes women in terms of their relationships, claims that their tired of “this everyday sexism”. The everyday sexism TeenVogue is tired of is encouraged by the narrative and marketing they push.
Is anyone else tired of hearing about how this little thing is sexist or how that little thing is sexist?
